INDIANA GENEALOGY EXPRESS

A Part of Genealogy Express

 

Welcome to
MARION COUNTY, INDIANA
HISTORY & GENEALOGY

 

COURT NEWS
(Found at Genealogy Bank, Transcribed by Sharon Wick)

Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: Mar. 25, 1896
State of Indiana, Marion County, ss.:  In the Superior Court of Marion County, in the State of Indiana.
     No. 51956. Room No. 3. Complaint to quiet title to real estate.
     Charles F. Sayles vs. Indiana Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al.
     Be it known, that on the 15th day of February, 1896, the above named plaintiff, by his attorneys, filed in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Marion county, in the State of Indiana, his complaint against the above named defendants, and said the above named defendants, and said plaintiff having also filed in open court in the said Superior Court the affidavit of a competent person, showing that said defendants Stroughton F. Culley, Mary Culley McElroy, Henry C. Wilson, Oliver M. Wilson, George F. Pease and Arthur H. Pease are respectively not residents of the State of Indiana and that the residence of said defendants, the unknown heirs of William Wilson, deceased, is, upon diligent inquiry, unknown, and that each of said defendants is a necessary party to said action and that the object of said action is to quiet the title to real estate in Marion county, Indiana, and whereas said plaintiff having by indorsement on said complaint required said defendants to appear in said court and answer or demur thereto, on the 16th day of May, 1896.
     Now, therefore, by order of said court, said defendants above named as non-residents and as of unknown residence, are severally hereby notified of the filing and pendency of said complaint against them, and that unless they appear and answer or demur thereto, at the calling of said cause on the 16th day of May, 1896, the same being the twelfth judicial day of a term of said court, to be begun and held in teh courthouse in the city of Indianapolis, on the first Monday in May, 1896, said complaint and the matters and things therein contained and alleged, will be heard and determined in their absence.
         JAMES W. FESLER, Clerk
  Baker & Daniels, Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: Mar. 25, 1896
State of Indiana, Marion county, ss.:  In the Circuit Court of Marion county, in the State of Indiana.
     Matilda R. McConnell vs. Sarah A. Richardson, et al.
     No. 8151. Complaint to enforce Men upon real estate.
     Be it known, that on the 22d day of February, 1896, the above named plaintiff, by her attorney, filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Marion county, in the State of Indiana, her complaint against the above named defendants, and the said plaintiff having also filed in said Clerk's office the affidavit of a competent person, showing that said defendant, Mary H. Hinkley, is not a resident of the State of Indiana; that said action is to enforce a lien upon real estate and the said Mary H. Hinkley is a necessary party to said action, and whereas said plaintiff, having by indorsement on said complaint required said defendant to appear in said court, and answer or demur thereto, on the 1st day of June, 1896.
     Now, therefore, by order of said court, said defendant last above named is hereby notified of the filing and pendency of said complaint against her, and that useless she appear and answer or demur thereto, at the calling of said cause on the 1st day of June, 1896, the same being the first judicial day of a term of said court to be begun and held at the courthouse in the city of Indianapolis,  on the first Monday in June, 1896, said complaint and the matters and things therein contained and alleged, will be heard and determined in her absence.,
                JAMES W. FESLER, Clerk
     Charles A. Dryer, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: June 24, 1896
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT:
    
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has duly qualified as administrator of the estate of James I. Rooker, late of Marion County, Indiana.  Said estate is supposed to be solvent.
                                                                  WILLIAM V. ROOKER.
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: June 24, 1896
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT:
    
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has duly qualified as administrator of the estate of John Maurice Butler, late of Marion County, Indiana, deceased.  Said estate is supposed to be solvent.
                                                      ALPHEUS H. SNOW.
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: June 24, 1896
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT:
    
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has duly qualified as administrator of the estate of James A. McGuire, late of Marion County, Indiana, deceased.  Said estate is supposed to be solvent.
                                                            WILLIAM M. GRAHAM
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: June 24, 1896
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT:
    
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has duly qualified as administrator of the estate of Charles G. Kumler, late of Marion County, Indiana, deceased.  Said estate is supposed to be solvent.
                                                           NOAH N. KKUMLER
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: June 24, 1896
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT:
    
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned has duly qualified as administrator of the estate of Mary Mitchell, late of Marion County, Indiana, deceased.  Said estate is supposed to be solvent.
                                                              JOHN F. M'CLELLAND
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: June 24, 1896
Notice to Heirs, Creditors, Etc.
    
In the matter of the estate of Emil Fiedler, deceased.
     In the Marion Circuit Court, May term, 1896.
     Notice is hereby given that Adaline Denny, as administratrix of the estate of Emil Fiedler, deceased, has presented and filed her account and vouchers in final settlement of said estate, and that the same will come up for examination and action of said Circuit Court on the 1st day of July, 1896, at which time all heirs, creditors or legatees of said estate are required to appear in said court and show cause, if any there be, why said account and vouchers should not be approved.  And the heirs of said estate are also hereby required at the time and place aforesaid to appear and make proof of their heirship.
                                                           ADALINE DENNY.
Robert Denny
, Attorney
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: June 24, 1896
Notice to Heirs, Creditors, Etc.
    
In the matter of the estate of Dora C. Runnels, deceased.
     In the Marion Circuit Court, May term, 1896. 
     Notice is hereby that Orange S. Runnels, as administrator, with the will annexed, of the estate of Dora C. Runnels, deceased, has presented and filed his account and vouchers in final settlement of said estate, and that the same Circuit Court on the 30th day of June, 1896, at which time all heirs, creditors or legatees of said estate are required to appear in said court and show cause, if any there be why said account and vouchers should not be approved.  And the heirs of said estate are also hereby required at the time and place aforesaid to appear and make proof of their heirship.
                                                             ORANGE S. RUNNELS.
Miller, Winter & Elam
, Attorneys.
Source: Indiana State Journal
Dated: June 24, 1896
Notice to Heirs, Creditors, Etc.
 


 

CLICK HERE to GO TO
MARION COUNTY, INDIANA
INDEX PAGE
CLICK HERE to GO to
STATE OF INDIANA
INDEX PAGE
FREE GENEALOGY RESEARCH is My MISSION
GENEALOGY EXPRESS
This Webpage has been created by Sharon Wick exclusively for Genealogy Express  2008
Submitters retain all copyrights
 

.